KLI Colloquia are informal, public talks that are followed by extensive dissussions. Speakers are KLI fellows or visiting researchers who are interested in presenting their work to an interdisciplinary audience and discussing it in a wider research context. We offer three types of talks:
1. Current Research Talks. KLI fellows or visiting researchers present and discuss their most recent research with the KLI fellows and the Vienna scientific community.
2. Future Research Talks. Visiting researchers present and discuss future projects and ideas togehter with the KLI fellows and the Vienna scientific community.
3. Professional Developmental Talks. Experts about research grants and applications at the Austrian and European levels present career opportunities and strategies to late-PhD and post-doctoral researchers.
- The presentation language is English.
- If you are interested in presenting your current or future work at the KLI, please contact the Scientific Director or the Executive Manager.
Event Details
Topic description:
Collaboration, which I treat as occurring when two or more agents team up to take on a shared task, is foundational to human social life. However, rigorous work on the ontogeny and evolution of human collaboration is rather recent, though for some time there has been work in the philosophy of action that attempts to analyze the structure of collaboration in adults. What I will talk about in this discussion are some of the results of the work on collaboration that I have carried out over the past two years. The main focus of my talk will be on an analysis that Rory Smead (Northeastern University) and I recently completed. In our work, we present a game theoretic model of the evolution of learning rules in a population of individuals playing the Stag Hunt. We show that there is selection for the predisposition to cooperate in the Stag Hunt. We then relate this game theoretic model to recent empirical work on collaboration that shows a child’s ability to collaborate emerges around the same time ontogenetically across a range of apparently diverse environments. After reviewing the game theoretic model and the empirical work, I’ll discuss to what extent it is meaningful to call collaboration “innate.”
Biographical note:
Brian McLoone is a graduate student in the Philosophy Department at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. His research is in biology and cognitive science, primarily the conceptual and methodological issues that arise in both of these fields. He is currently a visiting fellow at the KLI Institute, working on a project called “Conceptual Issues Concerning the Ontogeny and Evolution of Human Collaboration.” The research he conducts at the KLI Institute is part of a long-term project to better understand humans’ ability to engage in collaborative activities. A “collaborative activity” occurs when two or more individuals take on some shared task. The task could be something as prosaic as moving a table, or as sophisticated as electing a new representative. A few of the more specific goals of Brian’s project are: to attempt to differentiate collaborative activities from other forms of cooperation; to develop a framework to understand how a human’s ability to collaborate develops in early life; to model the evolution of collaboration in group-structured populations; and to understand how a human’s ability to collaborate is related to other cognitive systems.
